Download PDF The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy book. Happy reading The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Manipulators - Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make Us Buy Pocket Guide.

Faith Popcorn. Gregory Diehl. All that you have to know about hosting successful webinars. Karthik Poovanam. Brand Success. Teespring Profit Made Easy. John Hawkins. Anatomy of a Trend. Henrik Vejlgaard. Take Their Breath Away. Chip R. The Ad-Makers. Tom von Logue Newth. Create Distinction. Scott McKain. The Tom Peters Seminar. Can't Buy Me Like. Bob Garfield.

Kristine Kathryn Rusch. How to Get Hung. Molly Barnes. Lasting Lessons from the Corner Office. Todd G Buchholz. Slipstream Marketing. Paul Short. Secrets of Successful Virtual Book Tours. Roxanne Rhoads. Jeffrey Robinson. Six Sigma Software Quality Improvement. Vic Nanda. How to write a great review.

The review must be at least 50 characters long. The title should be at least 4 characters long. Your display name should be at least 2 characters long. At Kobo, we try to ensure that published reviews do not contain rude or profane language, spoilers, or any of our reviewer's personal information. You submitted the following rating and review.

We'll publish them on our site once we've reviewed them. Continue shopping. Item s unavailable for purchase. Please review your cart. You can remove the unavailable item s now or we'll automatically remove it at Checkout. Remove FREE. Unavailable for purchase. Continue shopping Checkout Continue shopping. Chi ama i libri sceglie Kobo e inMondadori.

You are in the Portugal store Not in Portugal? Choose Store. Skip this list. Ratings and Book Reviews 0 0 star ratings 0 reviews. Overall rating No ratings yet 0. How to write a great review Do Say what you liked best and least Describe the author's style Explain the rating you gave Don't Use rude and profane language Include any personal information Mention spoilers or the book's price Recap the plot.

Close Report a review At Kobo, we try to ensure that published reviews do not contain rude or profane language, spoilers, or any of our reviewer's personal information. Would you like us to take another look at this review? James P. The Real Mad Men. Andrew Cracknell. Mark Hughes.

Ron Tite. Madboy: My Journey from Adboy to Adman. Richard Kirshenbaum. Lee Eisenberg. Punk Marketing. Richard Laermer. Jack Trout. The Conquest of Cool. Thomas Frank. Arthur Middleton Hughes. True Story. Ty Montague. The Content Marketing Strategy Guide. Jon M. Lucas McCain. The Professionals. Stephen Mills. Word Spy. Paul McFedries. Are You Brand Dead? Yulia Saksen. The Popcorn Report. Faith Popcorn.

Gregory Diehl. Branding the Man. Bertrand Pellegrin. All that you have to know about hosting successful webinars. Karthik Poovanam. Brand Success. Teespring Profit Made Easy. John Hawkins. Anatomy of a Trend. Henrik Vejlgaard. Take Their Breath Away. Chip R. The Ad-Makers. Tom von Logue Newth. Create Distinction.

Scott McKain. The Tom Peters Seminar. Citizen Designer. Steven Heller. Can't Buy Me Like. Bob Garfield. Kristine Kathryn Rusch. How to Get Hung. Molly Barnes. Lasting Lessons from the Corner Office. Todd G Buchholz. Slipstream Marketing. Paul Short. Secrets of Successful Virtual Book Tours. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal.

It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MiGs.

On One such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. No other calls would be made.

Vance Packard - Originally aired March 1989

The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F parts, parachute, etc.

The possibility of U. There is a possibility that such aircraft could be used in a deception operation designed to confuse enemy planes in the air, to launch a surprise attack against enemy installations or in a provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack U. And see this. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States — such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica — and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

Department of Defense also suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo. Congressional committee admitted that — as part of its "Cointelpro" campaign — the FBI had used many provocateurs in the s through s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

He explained : "In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque. The bulk of the nation's undercover work is done by local police officers or outsiders hired by the state, county or city police, according to the campus reports. Probably the best known undercover man in the United States, M. He was hired by the local sheriff's office and, according to an Ontario County grand jury, "advocated violent forms of protest" among student radicals.

He took part in a police drug raid on the Hobart campus last June 5. The Times reported the next year:. Thomas Tongyai, or Tommy the Traveler, for example, provided bombs and rifles for the students at Hobart College and recruited the secretary of the local R. Tongyai apparently was being paid by both the local sheriff's office and a Federal agency. The fire was blamed on dissenters and served as cause to declare campus protests "unlawful assemblies".

Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques , likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.

Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication. The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter. In the '90s, we turned to a different tactic And you can see how successful that was in places like, you know, the Republican National Conventions in both New York City and Minneapolis, where we even got people to - you know, we were able to encourage people to do things like, you know, do acts of violence, which then would make it possible for us to come in and sweep the streets and bring in large amounts of SWAT team tactical police.

It was really effective. This cartoon sums up the way which provocateurs distract attention from the real messages behind peaceful protests. Her statement was arranged by a Congressman who admitted that he knew that she was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U. Official documents from the Royal Ulster Constabulary i.

And see this and this. The manual was authenticated by the U. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that — during the presidential debate — President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:. At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.

This frame-up job was so successful at whipping up fear that it got German Chancellor Kohl re-elected, and the U. They lured foreign migrants into the country, executed them in a staged gun battle, and then claimed they were a unit backed by Al Qaeda intent on attacking Western embassies". Specifically, Macedonian authorities had lured the immigrants into the country, and then - after killing them - posed the victims with planted evidence — "bags of uniforms and semiautomatic weapons at their side" — to show Western diplomats.

Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters. Top U. Despite previous "lone wolf" claims, many U. Many U.

The key point is that the U. Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. For example, a CIA official insists the Bush administration was made aware some time before the State of the Union address that the claims that Iraq was trying to purchase yellow case uranium from Niger was false.

Secretary of Defense admitted that interrogators were authorized to use the following method:. False Flag: Convincing the detainee that individuals from a country other than the United States are interrogating him. While not a traditional false flag attack , this deception could lead to former detainees - many of whom were tortured - attacking the country falsely blamed for the interrogation and torture.

It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda's ranks, causing operatives to doubt others' identities and to question the validity of communications.

According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla's 'pseudo-gang' strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists.

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls 'action teams' in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. And we aren't going to tell Congress about it. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers.

Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U. The British soldiers shot two Iraqi policemen, killing one. The soldiers apparently possessed explosives , and were accused of attempting to set off bombs. While none of the soldiers admitted that they were carrying out attacks, British soldiers and a column of 10 British tanks stormed the jail they were held in, broke down a wall of the jail, and busted them out.

The extreme measures used to free the soldiers - rather than have them face questions and potentially stand trial - could be considered an admission. He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs inclined to do anything. And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent, beat them for blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them.

Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes. Germany's federal police chief admitted that - while the undercover officer worked for the German police - he acted illegally during a G8 protest in Germany in and committed arson by setting fire during a subsequent demonstration in Berlin.

The undercover officer spent many years living with violent "Black Bloc" anarchists.

The Manipulators: Unmasking the Hidden Persuaders --- The Conspiracy To Make...

The uniformed officers didn't know the undercover officers were cops. Videos and photos see this and this , for example show that violent protesters wore very similar boots and other gear as the police, and carried police batons. The Globe and Mail reports that the undercover officers planned the targets for violent attack, and the police failed to stop the attacks. Prosecutors admit that one of the undercover officers purchased and constructed illegal "lock boxes" which ended up getting many protesters arrested. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.

The Washington Post reported :. The Wall Street Journal wrote :. A leaked recording published anonymously on the platform purported to reveal a conversation in which Turkey's foreign minister, spy chief and a top general appear to discuss how to create a pretext for a possible Turkish attack within Syria. And the New York Times noted :. The officials were heard discussing a plot to establish a justification for military strikes in Syria.

One option that is said to have been discussed was orchestrating an attack on the Tomb of Suleyman Shah Suleiman Shah Tomb is an important Turkish landmark, being the burial place of the founder of the Ottoman Empire. For example, the Turkish officials said :. Ahmet Davutolu: "Prime Minister said that in current conjuncture, this attack on Suleiman Shah Tomb must be seen as an opportunity for us.

Hakan Fidan: "I'll send 4 men from Syria, if that's what it takes. I'll make up a cause of war by ordering a missile attack on Turkey ; we can also prepare an attack on Suleiman Shah Tomb if necessary. Feridun Sinirliolu: "Our national security has become a common, cheap domestic policy outfit.

More titles to consider

Turkish officials confirmed that the leaked recording was authentic , and Turkish leader shut down Youtube to stop its spread online. High-level American sources have more or less confirmed this. It's gotten so ridiculous that a U. Congresswoman - who introduced a similar bill in the House - says : "For years, the U. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in Newsweek reported in Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers.

After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a "throwdown"—police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout. Wikipedia notes :. Police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways , as well. He has himself admitted to carrying out a false flag attack.

Maddox notes :. Provocation is one of the most basic, but confounding, aspects of warfare. Despite its sometimes obvious use, it has succeeded consistently against audiences around the world, for millennia, to compel war. A well-constructed provocation narrative mutes even the most vocal opposition.

The culmination of a strategic provocation operation invariably reflects a narrative of victimhood: we are the victims of the enemy's unforgivable atrocities. In the case of strategic provocation the deaths of an aggressor's own personnel are a core tactic of the provocation. The persistent use of strategic provocation over centuries — and its apparent importance to war planners — begs the question of its likely use by the US and other states in the near term. But a video shows that it was Israeli settlers who lit the fires.

No mention of USS Liberty. But I've written extensively about it. During that time the Free Publications and Newspapers around the world, including the Bangkok Post, were screaming the Truth and warning the world about the folly of America's planned invasion. The govt and the press had convinced America they were Heroes. Not much chance of that happening as historical revisionism is seen antisemitic. And we can't have that can we! War is simply the way sociopathic bloodlines kill off non-sociopathic bloodlines in order to perpetuate their own, and the non-sociopaths let them. Seems no one ever wants to discuss how the financial and political sociopaths finance, organize and pull-off this blood-letting every so often.

I guess that would be anti-semitic. Britain badly wanted the rich Babylonian Jews of Iraq to leave their palatial mansions in Iraq to help those not-so-rich British Jews to found the fledgling nation of Israel. But Iraqi Jews refused to budge like the present day Iranian Jews. So, Britain started working. The modus operandi was to send British Indian soldiers dressed as Iraqi Moslems to create explosions in the Jewish quarters of Baghdad.

The puppet Iraqi king helplessly watched. The puppet King of Iraq again kept silent as otherwise the British would kill him. Yes, finally the Babylonian Jews' resolve was broken and the exodus began only to find that while they lived in palatial mansions in Iraq, the jealous British Jews put them in tents in Israel, so most of them escaped to USA. And we Americans are still paying a heavy price for that blunder! All this happened right before the eyes of present day elderly Iranian Jews, so they and their children refuse to leave Iran NOW.

Soon, The British commander came running to the hospital, ignored doctor's pleadings and carried away that hapless, heavily charred guy to his death - to belatedly cover up British responsibility for the bombings. Mass public hysteria is being manufactured to justify aggression against Moscow and Pyongyang, in retaliation for acts attributed to the North Korean and Russian governments, but orchestrated and carried out by the CIA and the Pentagon.

The campaign of aggression against North Korea, from the hacking of Sony and the crescendo of noise over the film, The Interview, bears all the markings of a CIA false flag operation. The hacking and alleged threats to moviegoers has been blamed entirely on North Korea, without a shred of credible evidence beyond unsubstantiated accusations by the FBI. Pyongyang's responsibility has not been proven.

But it has already been officially endorsed, and publicly embraced as fact. The actual individuals of the mysterious group responsible for the hacking remain conveniently unidentified. A multitude of possibilities -- Sony insiders, hackers-for-hire, generic Internet vandalism -- have not been explored in earnest. Who benefits? It is illogical for Pyongyang to have done it. Isolated, impoverished North Korea, which has wanted improved relations with the United States for years to no avail , gains nothing by cyberattacking the United States with its relatively weak capabilities, and face the certainty of overwhelming cyber and military response.

On the other hand, Washington benefits greatly from any action that leads to regime change in North Korea. But discussion about Pyongyang's involvement -- or lack of -- risks missing the larger point. This project, from the creation of The Interview to the well-orchestrated international incident, has been guided by the CIA, the Pentagon, and the State Department from the start. It is propaganda. It is a weapon of psychological warfare. It is an especially perverted example of military-intelligence manipulation of popular culture for the purpose of war.

There is nothing funny about any of it. The Interview was made with the direct and open involvement of CIA and Rand Corporation operatives for the express purpose of destabilizing North Korea. Star and co-director Seth Rogen has admitted that he worked "directly with people who work in the government as consultants, who I'm convinced are in the CIA". Originally conceived to be a plot taking place in an "unnamed country", Sony Pictures co-chairman Michael Lynton, who also sits on the board of the Rand Corporation, encouraged the film makers to make the movie overtly about murdering Kim Jong-Un.

Bruce Bennett, the Rand Corporation's North Korean specialist, also had an active role, expressing enthusiasm that the film would assist regime change and spark South Korean action against Pyongyang. Other government figures from the State Department, even operatives connected to Hillary Clinton, read the script. The infantile, imbecilic, tasteless, reckless idiots involved with The Interview, including the tasteless Rogen and co-director Evan Goldberg, worked with these military-intelligence thugs for months.

They do not seem to have had any problem being the political whores for these Langley death merchants. In fact, they had fun doing it. They seem not to give a damn, or even half a damn, that the CIA and the Pentagon have used them, and co-opted the film for an agenda far bigger than the stupid movie itself. All they seem to care about was that they are getting publicity, and more publicity, and got to make a stupid movie.

Witness the ignorant squeals and cries from ignorant Americans about how "we can't let North Korea blackmail us", "we can't let Kim take away our free speech". Listen to the ridiculous debate over whether Sony has the "courage" to release the film to "stand up to the evil North Koreans" who would "blackmail America" and "violate the rights" of idiot filmgoers, who now see it as a "patriotic duty" to see the film.

These mental midgets -- their worldviews shaped by the CIA culture ministry with its endorsed pro-war entertainment, violent video games, and gung-ho shoot 'em ups -- are hopelessly brain-curdled, irretrievably lost. Nihilistic and soulless, as well as stupid, most Americans have no problem seeing Kim Jong-Un killed, on screen or in reality. And then there are the truly dumb, fools who are oblivious to most of reality, who would say "hey lighten up, it's only a comedy" and "it's only a movie".

The CIA's business is death, and that there are actual assassination plans in the files of the CIA, targeting heads of state. Kim Jong-Un is undoubtedly on a real assassination list. This is no funny, either. The provocative, hostile diplomatic stance of the Obama administration speaks for itself. Washington wanted to spark an international incident. It wants regime change in Pyongyang, does not care what North Korea or China think, and does not fear anything North Korea will do about it. On the other hand, imagine if a film were about the assassination of Benjamin Netanyahu and the toppling of the government in Tel Aviv.

Such a film, if it would ever be permitted even in script form, would be stopped cold. If it made it through censors that "magically" never slowed down The Interview and yes, there is censorship in America, a lot of it Obama would personally fly to Tel Aviv to apologize. At the very least, Washington would issue statements distancing themselves from the film and its content.

Not so in the case of The Interview. Because American elites actually want the Kim family murdered. Despite providing no proof of North Korean involvement, President Barack Obama promised a "proportional response". Promptly, North Korea's Internet was mysteriously shut down for a day. Given the likelihood that North Korea had nothing to do with either the hacking of Sony, the initial pulling of the movie a big part of the publicity stunt, that was not surprisingly reversed or the "blackmailing" of moviegoers, the shutting down of North Korea's Internet was therefore a unilateral, unprovoked act of war.

Washington has not officially taken responsibility. For reasons of plausible denial, it never will. Perhaps it was a dry run. A message. The US got to test how easily it can take down North Korea's grid. As we witnessed, given overwhelming technological advantage, it was very easy.

And when a war against Pyongyang begins in earnest, American forces will know exactly what they will do. The US is flexing its Asia-Pacific muscles, sending a message not only to Pyongyang, but to China, a big future target. Some of the other muscle-flexing in recent months included the anti-Beijing protests in Hong Kong assisted by the CIA and the US State Department , ongoing provocations in the South China Sea over disputed oil, and new defense agreements that place new anti-missile systems and missile-guided naval vessels to the region.

The bottom line is that America has once again been mobilized into supporting a new war that could take place soon. The CIA and Sony have successfully weaponized a stupid movie, making it into a cause and a battle cry. If and when bombs fall on North Korea, blood will be on the hands of the makers of The Interview, every single executive who allowed it to be made, and the hordes who paid to see it. If America were a decent, sane society, The Interview would be exposed, roundly denounced, boycotted and shunned.

Instead it is celebrated. The CIA should be condemned. Instead, Seth Rogen hangs out with them. America, increasingly dysfunctional, loves them. Obeys them. Regarding The Interview, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich issued a statement in sympathy with North Korea, correctly calling the film's concept aggressive and scandalous, and decried the US retaliatory response as counterproductive and dangerous to international relations. If Kim is today's object of ridicule, Putin is Evil Incarnate.

The CIA and its worldwide network of propagandists pinned the blame on Putin and Russia for aggression, and for obstructing "democracy". This false flag operation was blamed on Russia -- "Putin's Missile". The war against the Islamic State -- a massive CIA false flag operation -- seeks to topple with the the Assad government as well as to militarily counter Russia.

The ongoing Anglo-American conquest of regional oil and gas supplies, and energy transport routes is also aimed at checkmating Russia and China across the region. Full-scale military escalations are being planned. The US Congress is pushing new legislation tantamount to an open declaration of war against Russia. What next? Another "parody". Or how about a movie about killing Assad, or anyone else the United States wants to make into a Public Enemy?

Don't think Langley isn't working on it. In the midst of all escalating war hysteria comes news that Jeb Bush is "actively exploring" running for president in The long predicted return of the Bush family, the kings of terrorism, the emperors of the false flag operation, back to the White House appears imminent. The presidential "contest" will be a charade. It is likely to put forth two corrupt establishment political "friends" posing as adversaries, when in fact, they are longtime comrades and conspirators.

On one side, Hillary and Bill Clinton. On the other side, Jeb Bush, with George H. The fact is that the Clintons and Bushes, and their intertwined networks, have run the country since the s, their respective camps taking turns in power, with Obama as transitional figurehead his administration has always been run by neoliberal elites connected to the Clintonistas, including Hillary Clinton herself. The collective history of the Bushes stretches back to the very founding of the American intelligence state.

It is the very history of modern war criminality. The resume is George H. While it remains too early to know which way the Establishment will go with their selection and it depends on how world war shakes out between now and , it is highly likely that Jeb. Hillary Clinton has already been scandalized -- "Benghazi-ed". He has waited years for the stupid American public to forget the horrors that his family -- Georges H. And now Americans , with their ultra-short memories, have indeed forgotten, if they had ever understood it in the first place.

And the American public does not know who Jeb Bush is, beyond the last name. Jeb Bush, whom Barbara Bush always said was the "smart one", has been involved in Bush narco-criminal business since Iran-Contra. His criminal activities in Florida, his connection with anti-Castro Cuban terrorists and other connections are there, for those who bother to investigate them.

Bush, the next up and coming political Bush -- conveniently appeals to the fastest-growing demographic, as well as those in the southern hemisphere drug trade. Recent Obama overtures towards the Latino demographic -- immigration, Cuba -- appear to be a Democratic Party move to counter Jeb Bush's known strengths in the same demographic. But the mass murdering war criminal Bushes are saints. A Jeb Bush presidency will be a pure war presidency, one that promises terror, more unspeakable than we are experiencing now, lording it over a world engulfed in holocaust.

This is not a movie. It also calls into question all the other conclusions and reports by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons OPCW , which was assigned in "to establish facts surrounding allegations of the use of toxic chemicals, reportedly chlorine, for hostile purposes in the Syrian Arab Republic. As you recall, the Trump administration initiated a coordinated bombing of Syrian government facilities with the UK and France within days of the Douma incident and before a full investigation of the scene could be completed, charging Assad with the "barbaric act" of using "banned chemical weapons" to kill dozens of people on the scene.

Bomb first, ask questions later. The OPCW began their investigation days after the strikes. The group drew on witness testimonies, environmental and biomedical sample analysis results, and additional digital information from witnesses i. In July , the OPCW released an interim report on Douma that said "no organophosphorus nerve agents or their degradation products were detected, either in the environmental samples or in plasma samples from the alleged casualties," but that chlorine, which is not a banned chemical weapon, was detected there.

The report cited ballistic tests that indicated that the canisters found at two locations on the scene were dropped from the air witnesses blamed Assad's forces , but investigations were ongoing. The final report in March reiterated the ballistics data, and the conclusions were just as underwhelming, saying that all of the evidence gathered there provides "reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon took place," due in part to traces of chlorine and explosives at the impact sites.

Now, the leaked internal report apparently suppressed by the OPCW says there is a "high probability" that a pair of chlorine gas cylinders that had been claimed as the source of the toxic chemical had been planted there by hand and not dropped by aircraft. This was based on extensive engineering assessments and computer modeling as well as all of the evidence previously afforded to the OPCW.

What does this mean? To my mind, the canisters were planted by the opposition in an effort to frame the Syrian government. The OPCW has confirmed with the validity of this shocking document and has offered statements to reporters, including Peter Hitchens, who published the organization's response to him on May The ramifications of this turn of events extend far beyond simply disproving the allegations concerning the events in April The credibility of the OPCW itself and every report and conclusion it has released concerning allegations of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government are now suspect.

The extent to which the OPCW has, almost exclusively, relied upon the same Syrian opposition sources who are now suspected of fabricating the Douma events raises serious questions about both the methodology and motivation of an organization that had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in for "its extensive efforts to eliminate chemical weapons. In a response to Agence France-Presse AFP , OPCW director general Fernando Arias acknowledged there is an internal probe into the memo leak but that he continues to "stand by the impartial and professional conclusions" of the group's original report.

He played down the role of the memo's author, Ian Henderson, and said his alternative hypotheses were not included in the final OPCW report because they "pointed at possible attribution" and were therefore outside the scope of the OPCW's fact finding mission in Syria. Self-produced videos and witness statements provided by the pro-opposition Violations Documentation Center, Syrian Civil Defense also known as the White Helmets , and the Syrian American Medical Society SAMS , a non-profit organization that operates hospitals in opposition-controlled Syria, represented the heart and soul of the case against the Syrian government regarding the events in Douma.

To my mind, the internal memo now suggests that these actors were engaging in a systemic effort to disseminate disinformation that would facilitate Western military intervention with the goal of removing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power. This theory has been advanced by pro-Assad forces and their Russian partners for some time. But independent reporting on the ground since the Douma incident has sussed out many of the same concerns.

From James Harkin, director of the Center for Investigative Journalism and a fellow at Harvard University's Shorenstein Center, who traveled to the site of the attacks and reported for The Intercept in February of this year:.

The imperative to grab the fleeting attention of an international audience certainly seems to have influenced the presentation of the evidence. In the videos and photos that appeared that evening, most analysts and observers agree that there were some signs that the bodies and gas canisters had been moved or tampered with after the event for maximum impact. The Syrian media activists who'd arrived at the apartment block with the dead people weren't the first to arrive on the scene; they'd heard about the deaths from White Helmet workers and doctors at the hospital.

That was when the OPCW was given the responsibility of eliminating Syria's declared arsenal of chemical weapons; this task was largely completed by However, the Syrian opposition began making persistent allegations of chemical weapon attacks by the Syrian government in which chlorine, a substance not covered by Syria's obligation to be disarmed of chemical weapons, was used. The priority of effort for the FFM early on was to investigate allegations of the use of chlorine as a weapon.

So from its very inception, the FFM had to rely on the anti-Assad opposition and its supporters for nearly everything. The document that governed the conduct of the FFM's work in Syria was premised on the fact that the mission would be dependent in part upon "opposition representatives" to coordinate, along with the United Nations, the "security, logistical and operational aspects of the OPCW FFM," including liaising "for the purposes of making available persons for interviews. One could sense the bias resulting from such an arrangement when, acting on information provided to it by the opposition regarding an "alleged attack with chlorine" on the towns of Kafr Zeyta and Al-Lataminah, the FFM changed its original plans to investigate an alleged chlorine attack on the town of Harasta.


Full text of "The-Hidden-History-of-Money-and-Feudal-Order"

This decision, the FFM reported, "was welcomed by the opposition. The inability to go to Kafr Zeyta precluded the group from "presenting definitive conclusions," according to the report. But that did not stop the FFM from saying that the information given to them from these opposition sources, "including treating physicians with whom the FFM was able to establish contact," and public domain material, "lends credence to the view that toxic chemicals, most likely pulmonary irritating agents such as chlorine, have been used in a systematic manner in a number of attacks" against Kafr Zeyta.

All of this is worrisome. It is unclear at this point how many Syrian chemical attacks have been truly confirmed since the start of the war. In February of this year, the Global Policy Institute released a report saying there were such reports, but they were broken down into "confirmed," "credibly substantiated," and "comprehensively confirmed. They do not go into further detail about those bodies and sources, but are sure to thank the White Helmets and their "implementing partner" Mayday Rescue and Violations Documentation Center, among other groups, as "friends and partners" in the study.

So it becomes clear, looking at the Kafr Zeytan inspection and beyond, that the same opposition sources that are informing the now-dubious OPCW reports are also delivering data and "assistance" to outside groups reaching international audiences, too. The role of the OPCW in sustaining the claims made by the obviously biased Syrian opposition sources cannot be understated -- by confirming the allegations of chemical weapons use in Douma, the OPCW lent credibility to claims that otherwise should not -- and indeed would not -- have been granted, and in doing so violated the very operating procedures that had been put in place by the OPCW to protect the credibility of the organization and its findings.

There is an old prosecutorial rule -- one lie, all lies -- that comes into play in this case. With the leaked internal report out there, suggesting that the sources in the Douma investigation were agenda-driven and dishonest, all information ever provided to the OPCW by the White Helmets, SAMS, and other Syrian opposition groups must now, in my mind, be viewed as tainted and therefore unusable. Given the bias already on display this will further politicize the OPCW. Given what we know of the Skripal hoax and the Tories attitude to the truth with their government funded 'Integrity Initiative' through the Institute of Statecraft' that exactly what the British Intelligence intended.

As B and many other media pointed out: the crew of the Japanese tanker all said the ship was hit by an air borne projectile. This was not a mine.